Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 02:18
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Is there a band whose members have been present for every one of their concerts?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
How do I become a Buddhist, and can someone explain Buddhism to me?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
Why does everyone hate Ed Sheeran so much?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Steam gamers given 24 hours to grab hit game completely free - GAMINGbible
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Elden Ring Nightreign maintenance makes matchmaking less of a headache - Eurogamer
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
This nonhormonal hot-flash remedy gives options to women, experts say - The Washington Post